Search F News...

Reading Anti-Trans Legislation

An annotated reading list and list of resources.

By Featured, News

A child floats away from the adults and other children in their lives.

Illustration by Jade Sheng.

The sustained attack on the rights of trans people in the United States – to participate in public life, to seek healthcare, to be recognized and supported by our loved ones, to even exist – continues. The legal attacks coming out of Idaho, Texas, and many other states mirror those in the since-repealed, infamous HB 2. The North Carolina law prevented trans people from using the correct restroom and re-defined ‘sex’, for the purpose of anti-discrimination laws, as exclusively what is listed on a person’s birth certificate effectively putting trans people outside the scope of anti-discrimination laws. (HB 2 was by no means the beginning of these attacks. I mention it here because of the widespread attention the bill got, and because HB 2 came out the same year this trans correspondent did.)

Let me be blunt. The people creating and funding anti-trans legislation aim to prevent trans kids from becoming trans adults, and they don’t care if that means we’re closeted or dead. The guise of concern for cis kids doesn’t extent beyond a fear that seeing acceptance for trans kids will lead to cis kids being supporting, or (god forbid) coming out themselves.

Here is a non-exhaustive overview of what lawmakers are currently trying to limit, ban, and criminalize:

  • The right of teachers to accept their trans students and to respect students’ wishes when they want their coming out to be confidential.
  • The right of parents and legal guardians to accept their trans kids and to choose evidence-based medical treatments (such as puberty blockers) for their children based on their knowledge, pediatrician recommendations, and the child’s wishes. The use of puberty blockers for trans adolescents is well supported by studies, including one last year by University College London and the NHS on trans kids ages 12-15, in which the vast majority of participants reported feeling happier and more comfortable on blockers. Puberty blockers were developed to delay early-onset puberty in cis children. This use isn’t challenged by these bills, despite lawmakers claiming that the use of blockers in trans adolescents is dangerous enough to warrant banning it. 
  • The right of trans adults under 21 to choose evidence-based medical treatments, including hormones and surgeries. Like puberty blockers, the majority of these treatments were developed for and continue to be used by cis patients (for example as hormonal contraceptives, low testosterone treatment, and chest reduction or augmentation), and their use in trans care is well supported. These bills only target these evidence-based treatments when they are being used by trans people.
  • The right of doctors to provide evidence-based treatments to their patients with the consent of said patients and, when relevant, the patients’ parents and legal guardians.
  • The right of trans students to use the appropriate bathroom at school. These bills claim to be aimed at preventing violence. They have been proven to fail to do so, including by a 2018 study by the Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law. 
  • The right of trans students, in particular trans girls, to participate in sports on the appropriate teams. Lawmakers argue this is necessary on the basis of differences in hormones, which exist person-to-person (cis or trans) especially during adolescence. Many of the students being targeted by this legislation would like to change their hormone levels with puberty blockers and, when age-appropriate, HRT, treatments that are also being restricted and criminalized by these proposals.  Cis students will not be required to prove that they have ‘normal’ hormone levels in order to participate in sports on their chosen teams. 



  • (CW: police violence, sexual assault.) In Kuwait, the law criminalizing ‘imitation of the opposite sex’ has been overturned. 
  • (CW: descriptions of anti-trans violence.) Trans people have been unable to escape the violence in Ukraine because of their identity documents having their assigned sex–this violence at the border is doubly compounded for Black trans people trying to leave Ukraine, who are being targeted by racist “Ukranian First” policies. 
  • Trans rights and access to trans healthcare continue to be restricted in the United Kingdom, where access to puberty blockers for trans minors and trans access to treatments readily available to cis patients (such as hormones and chest surgeries) are being heavily limited by ongoing court battles. 



Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

18 + 10 =