Search F News...

I Hate “Love”

Judd Apatow’s latest effort is offensively disappointing.

By Entertainment

illustration by Sophie Lucido Johnson

Illustration by Sophie Lucido Johnson

When I finished the tenth episode of Judd Apatow’s Netflix serial rom-com “Love,” I physically slapped my laptop like it was a human being and yelled, “Are you kidding me with this bullshit?” I don’t usually act like this while watching television shows; I’m generally kind and gentle with my computer. “Love” was so offensively, irredeemably terrible that I was angry enough to uncharacteristically hit my laptop — and I hit it hard. That’s how bad it was.

Apatow created “Love” with writers Leslie Arfin and Paul Rust (Rust also stars in the show). Arfin and Rust are a couple in real-life; I can only hope, for their sake, that their actual relationship doesn’t remotely resemble the one they wrote for the screen. Rust plays opposite Gillian Jacobs — a person I just assumed would pick good projects for herself after starring in the near-perfect TV satire “Community.” I guess she must have been duped like I was when she saw Apatow’s name on the project — his previous television forays (“Freaks and Geeks,” “Undeclared,” and more recently “Girls”) have been charming, weird, and funny without being jokey. “Love,” on the other hand was, at best, watchable; but it was mostly depressing, unbelievable, and offensive.

It seems that the idea behind “Love” was to create a ‘90s-era romantic comedy (“When Harry Met Sally” comes to mind) that would be able to expand inside the binge-watching Netflix television genre. Also, this story would take place not in the ‘90s, but in the present! “Love” is filled with texting, talking about texting, emojis, and smartphones losing service in underground tunnels. Maybe “Love” is another nail in the coffin of romantic comedies; they’ve performed terribly in the box office for the past five years. To set an outdated relationship model inside an intentionally modern America is at once hard to believe and a missed opportunity.

My major complaint about “Love,” though, is that it is pure fantasy in all the worst ways: It’s a wet dream for guys society has deemed “losers” (the unemployed, the addicted, the nerdy, the overly cautious), placing them inside a world of exclusively beautiful women who are chomping at the bit to sleep with them. I’m all for storylines that allow women to be shallow, mean, egotistical, and complicated (Jacobs’ character Mickey is, indeed, all of those things); my problem is that the women in “Love” are punished for their shortcomings, while the men are not only forgiven, but celebrated.

Our hero Gus (Rust) breaks up with his girlfriend in the first episode when she tells him that she has been sleeping with someone else. However, it’s later revealed that she never cheated on him; she simply didn’t know how else she could end the relationship. When Gus and Mickey accidentally turn up at her house (Gus, high, has given Mickey the wrong address) she tells him, “I said that this isn’t working, I said that I don’t want to be in this anymore, and you would just hold me and tell me we would figure it out.” When he counters that he was only being thoughtful and kind, she says, “When one person wants out and the other person is forcing them to stay there, then your niceness becomes an assault.” And that’s true. But we’re supposed to see this ex-girlfriend character as irrational and uptight. Gus calls her a bitch and drives off to rant at Mickey about their break-up.

And what does Mickey do? Well, Gus is a little bit high, and a little bit depressed, so Mickey drives him back to his house, carries his boxes in for him (did I mention that she was the one who went into the ex’s house to get the boxes while Gus argued outside?), and tucks him in. She spends the bulk of the episode helping carry his emotional weight, and then tucks him in so he can drift off to sleep.

The show goes on, and there are misadventures and missteps; eventually, Gus tells Mickey he likes her (the best thing he does over the course of the entire series — and really the only time he honestly communicates with her), and they start to date. Gus takes Mickey out for dinner and points out to her that his only reason for ordering the dish he ordered is because he knows she likes the sauce on it. We are supposed to think this is nice, and that Mickey is dating a nice guy for a change, and that she should cherish this nice, sauce-giving guy for the rest of her life. If I had been in Mickey’s shoes, I’d have thought, “Order what you want to order; please don’t put me in the position of being ingratiated to you.” But that’s just me.

Then he takes her to a magic show, which Mickey is skeptical about. She doesn’t really like magic, she says. At the magic show, Mickey asks to borrow Gus’ coat, but Gus is reluctant because “they have a very strict dress code.” He eventually relents, but, unsurprisingly, the security guards come to kick the pair out when they see that Gus isn’t wearing a jacket at the show. Gus is pissed; Mickey is too. She doesn’t like rules that seem to be there for no reason; she doesn’t understand why all the magicians are men or why all the women are wearing such tight dresses; she tried to get into the date, but Gus wasn’t into the same things that she was. All valid points. And yet, still, Mickey is the one who is supposed to apologize.

Which she does. Mickey apologizes and apologizes and apologizes in every remaining episode. She’s a recovering addict who falls off the wagon a few times over the course of the series, but she makes a pretty diligent effort to clean herself up: She goes to AA meetings and calls her sponsor when she feels like drinking. Gus, on the other hand, never apologizes. Not for taking her to a sexist magic show; not for blowing her off the next day; and not for flirting and then sleeping with a hot blonde he works with.

I’m fine with non-monogamous relationships; I wish there was a television series (besides “Big Love”) that accurately depicted them. But this is not that. Gus sneaks around, lying to Mickey and lying to the hot blonde about his intentions. He refuses to communicate. He takes what is most convenient or immediately interesting to him, and shows no regard for anyone else in his life. If Mickey has to apologize for her behavior, then Gus should have to apologize, too.

And just a word on the casting here: Every woman with a speaking role in this series is conventionally attractive. Gus (skinny, big-nosed, openly nerdy, awkward in public) somehow manages to attract three thin, blonde women over the course of three days; they all look like they walked out of a magazine. Mickey’s ex-boyfriends are overweight, balding, and generally meritless. She is furthermore punished again and again for her sexuality (she sleeps with her boss — who openly sexually harasses her at work — to avoid getting fired, and is then berated and shamed repeatedly for doing so). Ultimately, she goes to a (ridiculous) meeting for “sex addicts” — a term that I struggle with in general, and one that implies that Mickey’s interest in sex is a major problem.

The best part of “Love” is the wonderful and charming Claudia O’Doherty, who plays Mickey’s Australian roommate Bertie. Bertie is a little clueless, but she’s funny and happy and ushers in most of the laughs the script (very) occasionally merits. Bertie is just getting to know Los Angeles, and wants to have a good time. She’s beautiful, kind, and thoughtful. So I guess it makes sense that she ends up sort of dating one of Gus’ overweight, unemployed friends who is into “really spicy food,” and that’s pretty much all.

If you’re wondering if there are any people of color on this show, the answer is yes: The producer/ director of the TV show Gus works on is played by Tracie Thoms, and is portrayed as unlikable beyond novelty. Her character’s nephew Kevin works on the show, and sometimes talks to Gus about his love life. Gus’ friends, who like to gather and write theme songs for movies that don’t have them already, are the bro-iest, most unmemorable white males you could imagine; except a girl named Cory (Charlyne Yi) is apparently dating one of them, and there’s a black girl who also shows up and doesn’t say much. Both girls look so tacked-on that you can’t help wondering what in the real world would ever compel them to hang out with these generic losers.

There are so many other things I hated about “Love” that I could fill a book. It went far beyond being a disappointment; it made me feel sad about humanity. There aren’t really any laugh-out-loud moments, either; there are, instead, parts where you feel so uncomfortable watching the characters flail about in social situations that you take out your phone to play Candy Crush in order to avoid having to look at them. There are tons of nature documentaries on Netflix that are way more romantic (and funny) than this entire series. I suggest watching one of those instead.

Sophie Lucido Johnson is the editorial advisor for F, and has written for The Guardian, VICE, Jezebel, The Nation, and others. She makes a ton of pie.
This user account status is Approved

12 Responses to I Hate “Love”

  1. Erica says:

    Hey Sophie. Great article! Also, Gillian Jacobs is the female lead on this. Gillian Anderson is on X-Files. watched the unfulfilling conclusions of both these shows within the same twenty-four hour span.

  2. wet dream loser says:

    i think you came down too harshly on the show. granted, the concept is pretty cliche’: shy, geeky nice-guy getting shit on by girls meets cool girl, they start dating, things get complicated, misadventures ensue, etc, but it’s by no means as offensive as you make it out to be. my impetus for watching the show was a part in the trailer when gus is getting himself psyched up at a party saying to himself, “be a man, be a man,” then signs and say “fuck you, you piece of shit”. i’ve totally done that and as a guy whose admittedly introverted, shy, and lacking esteem, i could totally relate. yet you simply dismiss this as “wet dream for guys society has deemed “losers”” – yeah, well maybe i’m one of those losers. there’s this underlying theme in the show that we are conditioned by TV/movies/books that there’s this concept of romance and chivalry — and it’s a lie. gus can’t help but succumb to these false notions. why is it so bad that he ordered the dish for the sauce for mickey? i’m fairly confident that he wasn’t trying to say “you are now forever ingratiated to me because i went out of my way to order you the sauce dish.” maybe he was trying to be nice. maybe he was trying to show her he likes her. maybe he’s still buying into idea chivalry. also, i don’t think it was his intention to take her to a “sexist magic show” – maybe he wanted to share something that he’s into with her, show her something quirky and usual that she wouldn’t ordinarily do on her own.

    the article is well written and you do make many valid points – a lot of the women gus is involved with are pretty, mickey’s boyfriends are schlubby (BTW what’s wrong with a guy being balding or overweight? if the same were said about women, you’d automatically be a “bodyshamer”), gus sleeping with the canadian actress and it somehow never coming to light, but i don’t think it was the intention of the show to villify women and make them “apologize” for their actions. you failed to mention that mickey was also kinda shitty to bertie – setting her up with gus, making her go on the movie tour. maybe as a guy i’m not as sensitive to your point, i felt gus and mickey were equally flawed and it made it seem at least somewhat genuine to me.

    I’m not saying “LOVE” is the greatest show ever – it’s good at best and i was hoping i’d be funnier, but i think it’s easy to nitpick details about things you already don’t enjoy or are not sympathetic to. for example the racial diversity issue was kind of a low blow – there are plenty of shows in the same genre’s that lack racial diversity, some of which you praised in the article (ie: freaks and geeks and girls).

    • Graying Nerd says:

      Check yr privilege, son. Being a nerd is not that hard. Listen to women and grow up. Stop telling women what they should say. You are tripping yourself.

  3. Vanessa says:

    This is so spot on and I agree completely. Thanks for sharing.

  4. Crapsandwich says:

    This is what equality looks like. I hate to have to chime in on such a first world problem,but I couldn’t help it. Outside the fact of “beta males” dating “alpha females” and “alpha female” having issues with “beta males” dynamic this show has all the things that men(including myself) hate about regular Rom-coms. Now, it was mentioned that it was ridiculous for Mickey to have to attend a sex addiction course for her sexual interests. But “sex addiction” became a thing when certain ideologies chose to demonize sexual interest of men and used media to spread it. If you truly thought it ridiculous then you should have been the first to be outraged upon phrases conception. Or is this yet another rant about sexism where it is okay for men but not women. Ironic isn’t it?

  5. Saturngrl says:

    This review was spot-on. I have been binging this show, getting angrier and angrier as it has become a male fantasy. I think you hit on every one of my criticisms, and I am just so happy to not feel alone in my distaste.

  6. Mssenos says:

    Uggh I hated Paul Rust! He was so cringey! Sorry but there isn’t a single reedimg quality about him. He’s lame, boring, and unattractive. Even his ‘niceness’ was fake.

  7. Jackson T says:

    You’re such an idiot, Love was a wonderful show, your rant (I can’t call it an article) is pure immature bs.

    • Danielle says:

      Hahah wow. I think Jackson must have been part of the show. Type in “Gus from tv show Love” in Google and read the first page of articles. Every single one agrees. Even take the looks out of it, Gus is so entitled, claims to be this self described nice guy but refuses to apologize for anything her does, loved it more when Mickey was damaged and as she improved herself he became more resentful. He’s a piece of shit with a short temper. Him completely losing his shit when driving- he deserved to side swipe those cars. At the writers table- deserved to get fired. When he bought plane tickets and just tried to get Mickey to rearrange his schedule and put him before work like he did- he’s a gaslighter, manipulative, deserved to get broken up with. He’s so immature and needs to grow up. The show was bearable. I watched it when it came out and again recently. It’s just brutal.

  8. Gus says:

    I think you took it too seriously, it’s just a netflix sitcom, not a manual for life.

  9. frank says:

    i couldn’t disagree more with your review. i admit i’m confused why heidi goes for gus (in season 1), but he did help her expand her role on the tv show (initially). as for why mickey goes for gus, that’s what the whole show is about. she wants a nice guy, looks are secondary. btw, sex addiction is very real. it’s not “a healthy sex drive,” it’s a sex drive out of control, making an individual do things they later regret or find unfulfilling and know this going in but can’t stop themselves. i have a friend who is one, and it has made his life worse, according to him. my bar for entertainment is very high; i hate most shows but found love great. claudia said “i’m into fat guys.” again, i have a friend who is only into heavy women. so that’s a thing too; not just a male fantasy. i agree she’s great, btw. your criticisms of gus’s character all strike me as *your* interpretations of his character, not so much the character as presented. i found him totally believable and mostly possessing of majorly positive character attributes, dealing w/a very troubled love interest. for the record, i am a big-time feminist, always have been. also, i have always hated the phenomenon of schlubby guys getting hot wives/girlfriends in sitcoms/movies, etc. but that’s the reality of the commerical marketing of shows and has been since ralph kramden married audrey meadows. so i’m no stranger to the notion of male fantasies pandered to in the media. but i found these characters all very believable in their choices. reading your review i kept muttering to myself, “that’s not true,” and “i didn’t see it that way” and “god you’re wrong about that,” and yes these things are subjective, but it seemed like you had an axe to grind. (i won’t mention the high IMDB rating for this series and the many, many serious reviews, ny times, etc., that have praised this series. oops…). i have found that when people (critics, whether “published” or just people i know viewing others) react so extremely, it’s usually because it pushes some button(s) personal to them. not sure what in your past, or life, presents those buttons, but… and yes, you will find kindred spirits to agree with you for possibly similar reasons. anyway, love = great show!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

4 × 3 =