Search F News...

Film Reviews

By Uncategorized

M*A*S*H gives a D*A*M*N

Before anyone recoils in horror, let me remind you that Robert Altman’s 1970 masterpiece has very little to do with the preachy wreck Alan Alda wrought later in the TV show’s existence, which is the period most of us are familiar with.

The movie is insane. In the best possible way, but it is insane. In fact, it wasn’t even directed—in true late sixties spirit, Robert Altman allegedly proceeded to confuse, bully, and alienate his lead actors (a particularly gorgeous and disaffected Donald Sutherland and Elliott Gould) until they were on the brink of mutiny. He then filmed it and sent that to his editor. I’m not certain that most of the film even had a script. The actors were encouraged to improvise and talk over each other, and do things like punch each other in the face without warning, which resulted in brilliant chaos—the sort that you couldn’t direct if you tried. And that was perfect, apparently, because it was the best commentary anyone could make on the debacle that Vietnam had turned into by the time the movie was being shot.

M*A*S*H, is the story of an army mobile hospital unit during the Korean war, was deliberately made to feel like Vietnam, down to the cone-shaped hats worn by the passer-bys in the one scene taking place in Seoul. The characters were closer in attitude to the kids being shipped off to ‘Nam than to the older soldiers who had been in Korea. The film follows the exploits and cheeky high jinks of Captain Hawkeye Pierce (Sutherland), who doesn’t care, and his fellow army surgeons, nurses, and radio operators, who similarly do not care because they can’t care without going insane. The one character who attempts to take himself seriously, Major Burns (Robert Duvall), is carted off midway through the film in a straightjacket; there is no respite from the constant aimless ridicule that angles all the way through the film and touches everyone from the harassed chaplain to the rigorously disciplined but ultimately defeated head nurse.

A series of bizarre and seemingly unrelated events happen over the course of Hawkeye’s one-year tenure in Korea: he steals a jeep, he plays golf, he drives his tent-mate insane, he passes himself off as a heart specialist and gets airlifted to Japan, he saves a few lives and loses a few lives, and then he hops into another stolen jeep, leaving everyone behind. The only cohesive element in the film is a series of preposterous loudspeaker announcements where a stuttering news operator reads out and mispronounces events, entertainment, news, high-pitched warbly Korean pop music, including a public service announcement about the dangers of marijuana, as well as a suggestion for army personnel to stop using it.

The film doesn’t try to make a point of the general pointlessness of the conflict the denizens of MASH #4077 are involved in (despite the uplifting “Suicide Is Painless” theme song), it just embodies it. It does exactly what good filmmaking is supposed to do: it doesn’t tell you something, it lives it. When asked how such a specimen as Hawkeye came to be in the army, the Sergeant in charge answers with a surprised, “He was drafted.” There is no reason, just a blind lottery. And there’s not much we can do to change that.

The Room with a view to crazytown

For those of you unfamiliar with the phenomenon The Room, by Tommy Wiseau, let me explain to you its cinematic importance. Wiseau, writer, producer, director, and star of his own great tome, opens his chef-d’oeuvre with loomingly epic ’90s synth-rock, festooned with Baroque flourishes. The camera pans from a pale blue sky to the Golden Gate Bridge, coming in over San Francisco, majestically, insinuating that you are about to be privy to a story. More than a story, a fable. We see a flash of the hero as he rides by, dressed all in black, on a streetcar. In the next cut, we are in the living room of the hero. As he enters, he greets his fiancée, Lisa, with an obtuse, “Hi BABE.” He gives her a newly purchased red dress. He tells her how “sexy she looks.” Then, a young college boy comes into the room. Johnny (Wiseau) spurts an equally obtuse, “Oh, hey Denny” at him, and we are off into the world of The Room.

Wiseau is either the world’s biggest fool, or a visionary—either way, he has produced something magnificent. This film, a romantic tragedy of friendship, betrayal and death, somehow manages to disrupt the normal sympathetic response of the viewer, thereby negating the expected, and producing hilarity. Wiseau’s use of symbolism is cliché to the point of gaudy greatness: red dress, de-petaled roses, over-played soft-core porn scenes that showcase some globular silicone lumps and Wiseau’s own pert butt cheeks. All these “tools” of various stylistic origins are brought together in an asinine but somehow endearing and confounding mash-up. Wiseau’s character, Johnny, seems to be a tabula rasa himself, presented as a foreigner with no discernible roots, who seeks to mimic his surrounding culture. This is made explicit in his dialogic style: parced phrases, spoken disjointedly as if they were remembered from some TV sit-com’s colloquial banter. Johnny is a socially alienated individual, which echoes how the film feels: like it is painfully distant from the viewer.

Through the course of this film, Johnny’s fiancée hooks up with his best friend, goes crazy, and fakes a pregnancy. His best friend deserts him, starts smoking pot and almost shoves a minor character off the roof of a building. The young college boy gets caught up with a drug dealer, and confesses his sexual love for the mother-like figure of Lisa. At the end of it all, Johnny blows his brains out the back of his skull due to Lisa’s erratic, manipulative and abusive love. With so much action, it is hard to imagine not getting caught up in the story.

This reviewer cannot help but notice that all these tired themes seem to be placed next to each other like an assemblage. It almost seems that Wiseau substituted the representations of the representations of emotions, actions, etc. for primary portrayals of them. This is both what causes verisimilitude to fail, and what makes the film a visionary comedic masterpiece. Simply put, this is a horribly made film but
a fantastic artifact.

The Good, the Bad and the Ugly squints its way into your heart

Sergio Leone’s 1966 The Good, the Bad and Ugly is the last installment of the epic Dollars Trilogy. Leone’s final chapter is assuredly the most successful of the Spaghetti Western genre. Shot in Spain, this film treats with both reverence and a most potent sort of parody (or even caricature) the quintessential American Western. The film incorporates slap-stick humor, exaggerated—if not cartoon-like—violence, and some of the best one-word lines, delivered by the strapping young Squint Eastwood.

Eastwood stars as the Good (aka Blondie, aka The Man With No Name), alongside a shifty smooth-talking Lee Van Cleef as the Bad (aka Angel Eyes) and Eli Wallach as the Ugly (aka Tuco, aka Benedicto Pacifico Juan Maria Ramirez). Tuco and Blondie have established a mutually beneficial partnership, through which they come to depend on one another like the Wiley Coyote and the Road Runner. The consistency with which they maim, torture, and nearly murder one another, is the routine of their high desert matrimony. Anvils aside, the two become involved in a violent sort of brinksmanship, in which fortunes, luck, and the upper hand change possession as quickly as Blondie can light up his trademark cigar and squint into the oppressive sun—a move that says more than any line in the script, and can melt the heart of even the most hardened graduate student. (The squint heard cross the world, one might say.)

The Good and the Ugly form a camaraderie of mutual assured destruction and affection (despite being brazen, cocksure loners) in a hunt for hidden gold, of course. Blondie and Tuco wind their way through a nightmarish vision of the Civil War era West and encounter the heartless mercenary Angel Eyes (the Bad), who proves to be a good match for the skilled, yet hapless pair. At one point they even inadvertently pledge allegiance to General Lee when they mistake an oncoming company of Union men in desert encrusted Union Blue, as Rebs. This misstep places them in the sadistic hands of the Bad who poses as a Union General in order to shake down POWs and generally beat the crap out of people.

The futility of lost causes, arbitrary justice in the western wilds, and scads of obviously Italian extras in uniform (the Union Army never looked so Italian!) punctuate their journey toward the treasure of colossal proportions. Speaking of colossal, the final duel is among the longest and, dare I say, best of the Western genre. This film is at once gorgeous, hilarious, silly, sincere, and poignant—as well as boasting the pinnacle of 60s pulp and pop in its score and opening credits. The poetics and jocularity of the homosocial bond struck by hardship, the desire for autonomy or wealth, and a constant race against one’s own past and identity (and everything else I’ve mentioned) render this film a masterpiece.

Read More

“Becoming Edvard Munch” at the Art Institute of Chicago

By Uncategorized

“Becoming Edvard Munch: Influence, Anxiety and Myth,” currently on display at the Art Institute of Chicago, takes a radical new approach to the retrospective exhibition in its ingenious curation of artist Edvard Munch (1863-1944).

Munch’s The Scream—famously reprinted on coffee mugs, umbrellas and even blow-up dolls and finger puppets—garnered additional attention in 2004 when one of the three versions of this painting was stolen from the Munch Museum in Oslo, Norway. It seems that while Edvard Munch may not be a household name, this painting most certainly is. While there are many reasons for its fame, perhaps this painting is particularly iconic because it seems to reaffirm notions of the creative genius as a tortured soul. Just as Vincent van Gogh is as famous for his insanity as he is for his paintings, so has Munch been slotted as the lone, desperate savant, forced to turn to artistic representation for release in an alienating world. However, with Munch, this may be equally a result of the ploys he used to self-promote, as it is our general fascination with the Bohemian Other.

But do not expect to see this mythical construction of Munch at AIC. As Jay Clarke, Associate Curator of Prints and Drawings and a leading Munch scholar, explained in the exhibition press release: throughout her research in Norway she “kept waiting for the ‘crazy Munch’ to reveal himself… but I never found him. Instead, the letters reveal a man very much in control of his career, even acting as his own dealer and organizing complex exhibitions and negotiations. Indeed, far from an independent, the artist was like a sponge, soaking up painting styles, motifs, and technical tricks from his contemporaries.”

Clarke’s presentation of Munch’s oeuvre is organized around popular themes that occur in his paintings, prints and drawings. Such themes include “Anxiety,” “Death and Dying,” “The Street” and “Bathing.” They serve to evaluate Munch’s work within the context his contemporaries—most notably, Paul Gauguin, Claude Monet, Max Klinger and Vincent van Gogh. This serves to present Munch as a shrewd artist responding to the images and themes of his contemporaries, engaged in the issues of his time.

Though you will not be able to see The Scream, paintings such as Kiss By the Window (1892), Anxiety (1894), and Evening on Karl Johan (1892) are some other well-known pieces on display. A small print entitled Flower of Pain (1897) visually represents the persona Munch would create for himself showing the artist’s blood as the source of a blooming lily. A representation that starkly contrasts with the numerous other self-portraits in the exhibition, including the debonair but murky Self-Portrait with a Cigarette (1895), in which the artist stares piercingly out of the canvas amidst a swirl of smoky liquefied paint.

What is most impressive is the number and diversity of images with which he worked, as well as the breadth of the work of others with which he was acquainted. 150 Munch prints and paintings are exhibited alongside 61 works by 43 other artists from whom he drew inspiration. What all of these images and comparisons demonstrate is Munch’s extraordinary ability to represent the intense emotions of men and women, whether in isolation or on a busy street.

Many of the prints exhibited come from the Institute’s own collection displayed in traditional “Munch style” wooden frames. In any given room one may see not only a large oil painting of a striking image, but the same image reproduced with varying colors and techniques in print. Most effective is the display of three prints of The Sick Child (1896) along a single wall. On the opposite wall is hung the larger painting. While these images were responses to the illness and death of his beloved sister Sophie, rather than imply an obsessive reworking of a psychically inescapable image, we see Munch as a keen artist modifying colors and design choices in order to convey a powerful situation. Further, The Sick Child is juxtaposed with fellow Norwegian painter Hans Heyerdahl’s Dying Child (1889), a painting and artist Munch both admired and emulated.

“Becoming Edvard Munch” questions the popular reliance of curatorial practices on the autobiographical and historical presentation of an artist’s persona, and asks what is gained when an artist creates a specific personality, as well as what is lost in our belief in that personality. By placing Munch within the context of his contemporaries, his localities, his conflicting statements and the statements of his peers, a multi-faceted artist reveals himself.

This exhibition should make us all question the singular ways in which we view artists, and recognize that a successful artist must be both creator and businessman, self-promoter and, at times, self-denigrator. Clarke’s refusal to take the Munch scholarship of old and Munch’s words themselves at face value is a bold move that questions established stereotypes and reminds us that identities are both self-asserted and publicly created.

On view through April 26 at the Art Institute of Chicago, 111 South Michigan Avenue, Chicago, Illinois, 60603-6404.  Mon.–Wed. 10:30 a.m.–5:00 p.m., Thurs. 10:30 a.m.–8:00 p.m., Fri. 10:30 a.m.–5:00p.m., Sat.–Sun. 10:00 a.m.–5:00 p.m.

All images courtesy of the Art Institute of Chicago.

Read More

SOMALIWOOD

By Uncategorized

Ohio’s Unlikely Film Industry

For many Americans, the nation of Somalia is a virtually unknown entity whose name conjures up little more than vague notions of piracy, Islamist militants and grave famine. The 33-year old Somali refugee Abdisalam Aato is trying to change all that, one movie at a time. Aato has been giving voice to an entire generation of Somalis since 2003, creating a veritable capital of Somali filmmaking on the way. Located in the unlikely town of Columbus, Ohio, Aato’s Olol Films has become the center of an industry that some have dubbed Somaliwood. Capitalizing on cheap digital formats and underground bootleg distribution, Olol Films has become a leader in the increasingly active realm of third world filmmaking.

A small city in the middle of the Midwest, Columbus may not seem like an obvious choice for a refugee filmmaker to set up shop. However, Columbus is home to the one of the largest communities of Somali refugees in the nation, with at least 45,000 Somali residents and around 500 Somali-owned businesses in the city, according to the Somali Community Association of Ohio. Columbus was Aato’s final stop in a journey that took him from watching movies as a kid in the Somali capital of Mogadishu, to running the world’s first Somali-owned and operated film company.

It was in Mogadishu that the filmmaker developed a passion for cinema. He describes his older brother taking him to the movie theater for the first time when he was five years old, an experience which impressed Aato so much, he would soon be spending five to seven days a week in the theaters. Since the movies were dubbed in Italian (the southern half of Somalia was once an Italian colony), Aato learned the language at a local cultural institute in order to understand the films by his cinematic idols, including Martin Scorsese, Francis Ford Coppola and Quentin Tarantino.

When civil war broke out in 1991, Aato and his family were among the hundreds of thousands of Somalis who fled Mogadishu. After spending four years in various refugee camps in Kenya, Aato and his siblings obtained U.S. visas and moved to Atlanta, Georgia, in 1996. Here, the 20-year old worked in a warehouse, volunteering for the local community access TV and radio station in his free time. Although he had never used a computer or video camera before arriving in the U.S., Aato quickly picked up the new skills. He bought his own home video camera, learned how to edit the film at the TV station, and began to contemplate opening his own film company.

Aato and his brother moved to Columbus in 2001 and founded a film company whose name reflected their experience as refugees (Olol is said to be the sound that lonely camels make when separated from their partners and children). Significantly, they chose to write their scripts in the Somali language, an even more radical move considering the fact that even in Somalia films aren’t screened in Somali. Their first feature film, Raajo (or Hope), was shot in the summer of 2003. Aato wrote, directed and produced the film, employing friends as actors and technicians, using local Somali musicians to create a soundtrack, and financing the entire project through the generous donations of friends and family: “We do a lot of begging to finance our films,” Aato says.

The movie, which focuses on the troubles and travails of young Somali refugees, was an enormous success in the Somali community. And though movie theatres are only intermittently safe to attend in Mogadishu, Aato claims that his movies are widely available throughout Somalia within three days of being released, thanks to a thriving bootleg industry. Through similarly illegal routes of distribution, Aato’s movies have reached Somali communities all over the world, attracting a huge following as far away as New Zealand and Australia.

Although he doesn’t stand to earn any profits from these unusual distribution methods, Aato embraces them. “I don’t do it for the money,” he says. “I want to write and preserve the history of this generation, and educate the generation to come.” The filmmaker says that the lack of Somali movies or other media from the past has doomed the stories of former generations to oblivion. Aato’s goal is to help future generations of Somalis remember what came before them.

Aato’s movies aren’t just for Somalis, though. He also hopes to introduce Somali culture to the rest of the world, and lend some dimensionality to Westerners’ largely negative understanding of his nation. To this end, Aato has also joined the Somali refugee community’s strong online presence with the creation of a website (bartamaha.com), which features political commentary, video clips of musical events and poetry readings, and short films, with content in both Somali and English.

Today, Olol Films has produced several shorts and music videos, five feature-length films and two documentaries, with several more projects planned for the future. Aato’s films have been shown in film festivals on the East Coast, in Canada, New Zealand and Australia. The growing success of Olol Films is testament to the digital image’s empowering potential for those who have long been denied access to traditional media outlets.

The popularity of Somaliwood is on par with the success of Third Cinema film industries, like Noliwood (the Nigerian film industry, now the third largest in the world, which also capitalizes on digital production and bootleg distribution techniques). Through these means, the peoples of economically depressed or war-torn nations are able to tell their own stories, write their own histories, and lay claim to an all-important agency to determine how they are represented—an agency that is long overdue.

To learn more about Olol Films, visit www.ololfilm.com

Promotional poster image courtesy of Olol Films

Read More

Econ Bubbles

By Uncategorized

Read More

A Life on the Edge: Howard Alk Film Retrospective

By Uncategorized

Howard Alk Film Retrospective
January 9-February 1, 2009

Throughout the month of January, the Chicago Film Archives, with the generous support of the Illinois Humanities Council, organized the first ever retrospective of the work of the late Chicago filmmaker Howard Alk. With credits that range from editor, cinematographer and director to writer and actor, Alk is a local legend best known for documentaries that helped define the social and political climate of the American 1950s (Cry of Jazz), ‘60s (American Revolution 2), and ‘70s (Janis, Eat the Document, Hard Rain, The Murder of Fred Hampton, Renaldo and Clara) often through the portrayal of musical icons like Sun Ra, Janis Joplin, and Bob Dylan.

Howard Alk: A Life on the Edge, hosted by Chicago Public Radio’s Alison Cuddy, was presented at two venues: the Chicago Cultural Center and the Gene Siskel Film Center. The program at times screened double features and included guests like Cry of Jazz producer Ed Bland and University of Chicago lecturer Judy Hoffman. During the screening of Cry of Jazz, which is credited as the first hip-hop film, producer Ed Bland remarked that Alk had a “funny antenna” and was “aware of many turns in terms of probes into the culture going on.” Bland, a Chicago native, remarked, “one of the functions of art is that it should move you. It should [make you] have a vivid emotional reaction.” In his introduction to Cry of Jazz, Bland said, “You may not like it, you probably won’t.”

What Bland may have been trying to express is that Alk’s films capture harsh realities and politics in a way that most audiences might find uncomfortable, hyperbolically comical, or politically incorrect. In Cry of Jazz, for example, one of the characters claims that jazz “music is more freeing than the Constitution and the Bill of Rights,” a “musical expression of triumph of the Negro spirit,” and a “swinging feeling of freedom” for the “futureless future.” The film declares the death of jazz and produces sentiments that seem ironic and outdated and yet all the more significant while viewed in the current era of America’s first black President. “[Cry of Jazz] wasn’t a commercially viable length and we didn’t give a damn,” Bland said. Like Bland, Alk’s visions at times alienated audiences. His films focused on the offbeat, the tumultuous, and the radical.

A Life on the Edge culminated at the Gene Siskel Film Center, with a screening of And This is Free, a documentary about Chicago’s original Maxwell Street Market, and My Friend Vince, a documentary about a Toronto street hustler. An alumnus of University of Chicago (he enrolled in 1944 at the age of 14) and co-founder of Second City (1959), Alk’s footsteps are deeply rooted throughout Chicago. His films such as And This is Free highlight the lesser-known wonders of the Windy City and showcase a cast of characters that truly produce a vivid reaction from their viewers.

The films screened during A Life on the Edge are of various lengths and subjects and probably cannot be found on YouTube or Netflix, Blockbuster or iTunes. Unconcerned with commercial success, Alk’s work combines captivating sounds and images shot in the streets of Chicago that represent and reflect the diversity and struggles of a changing Nation.

Read More

Interview with Bill Ayers

By Uncategorized


Bill Ayers delivered the lecture “The Right to Think: Expanding Imaginative Space” at the School of the Art Institute on February 9th, 2009.
In his lecture and interview, Ayers addressed a number of topics, including the importance of challenging dogma, and his experience of being thrust into the national spotlight during the election of Barack Obama.

Camera by Emma James and Brandon Kosters.

Video by Brandon Kosters.

Read More

The zany world of Troma’s founder: An Interview With Lloyd Kaufman

By Uncategorized

The zany world of Troma’s founder: An Interview with Lloyd Kaufman

Gregarious, good-natured, and with his characteristic bawdy sense of humor, Lloyd Kaufman behaves precisely as you’d expect him to, if you have seen any of his work. Troma Entertainment, the film production/distribution company that he founded in the 1970s with business partner Michael Herz, has been producing and distributing low budget, transgressive cinema for 35 years. Troma is responsible for The Toxic Avenger (1984), Class of Nuke ’Em High (1986), Tromeo and Juliet (1996) and, more recently, Poultrygeist: Night of the Chicken Dead (2006).

“I went to Yale University in the ’60s and I was going to be a teacher, or a social worker, and make the world a better place. Teach people with hooks for hands how to finger-paint. Teach bums how to paint happy faces on beads and string the beads together. But God placed me in a room with the guy who ran the Yale film society during my freshman year. It fucked my life. I kept drifting into screenings, and getting my mind blown by John Ford, Howard Hawks, Charlie Chaplin, Buster Keaton and Stan Brakhage (the greatest visual artist of my lifetime).”

It was at a screening of Ernst Lubitch’s To Be or Not to Be that Kaufman decided to make movies: “I would give what I had to give to the movie going world.”

Kaufman worked on a few major productions in the 1970s, before becoming disenchanted by mainstream cinema. He founded Troma with Michael Herz in 1974. “All of the major studios started to rip us off, so we had to switch to a different tack,” Kaufman says. “We read one day in Variety that horror films were dead: they were no longer viable economically. So Michael Herz and I said, ’Aha!” Kaufman decided to fuse his love of comedy and satire with gore. While the work he went on to produce was unquestionably influenced by the horror genre, Kaufman insists that simply calling his films horror movies is “100% incorrect.”

“My movies, at least the movies I write and direct, are satires. They are quizinart genres. They combine sex, horror, science fiction, Shakespeare, musical, and if you’ve seen Poultrygeist: Night of the Chicken Dead, nobody is horrified by that movie. Disgusted perhaps…but they are not terrified.”

He says that Troma is a “genre bender,” citing The Toxic Avenger as the prime example of what Troma strives to create. It has become so much a part of the American lexicon that it has been turned into an Off-Broadway musical, which opens in New York this April.

Kaufman went on to speak about the conception of the The Toxic Avenger. “I was at the Cannes Film Festival in 1982, and I had one of those sort of ‘Eureka!’ moments, when I realized, ’Aha! We’ll make the monster the hero!’ So we had the first hideously deformed creature of super–human strength from New Jersey (New Jersey, because I’m always in favor of the underdog).”

The fact that Troma is still in existence is something Kaufman attributes largely to the loyalty of their fan base. “I have felt that every movie that Michael Herz and I have directed has been a seminal piece,” Kaufman said. “The problem is that we are an independent, small company and the major media ignores us because the media is controlled by five or six devil-worshipping international media conglomerates, and we don’t exist.”

In addition to working in the film industry, Kaufman has also published a number of books, including Make Your Own Damn Movie! and All I Need to Know About Filmmaking I Learned from “The Toxic Avenger” (with Troma alumnus James Gunn), as well as his most recent: Direct Your Own Damn Movie!

Kaufman was also recently elected chairman of the Independent Film and Television Alliance (IFTA). “The IFTA is a trade association for the independent film community…about 200 companies are members…we are fighting for net neutrality. As long as the internet remains a level playing field, I think we all have hope.” Kaufman recently posted what he calls a “public service announcement about media consolidation.” Kaufman says, “People have as much access to that as they do to Hannah Montana,” and this, Kaufman asserts, is what he is fighting for.

“The bad guys want a situation where the internet becomes ABC, CBS and NBC… and you can see the internet being colonized as we speak. You’ve got Hulu [Hulu.com], which is a conspiracy of Fox and NBC and Sony. They’re trying to get Congress and the FCC to give them the right to create a superhighway that only they, the elite, can traverse.”

“The big guys…[should recognize]…that colonization has never worked. Just ask the French.”

Read More

Presentation: Wellington Duke Reiter discusses SAIC's future

By Uncategorized

On Dec. 17th, 2008 president Wellington Duke Reiter gave a presentation to all SAIC faculty members and staff.

Camera/Edit/Interview by Ya-Ting Hsu

Read More

The Blackest History Month Ever

By Uncategorized

by QX Roper

Four score, and many centuries ago, my great ancestors were kidnapped from their homes, torn away from their families, robbed of their dignity and given the burden of creating one of the most powerful nations on this Earth.  Their children, descendants, and generations to follow carried this painful weight, not comprehending what their contribution would be to this great country called America.  Most of them did not understand their identity but all of them understood the struggle.

Today, I find myself laughing at the irony that a century ago a literate black man was to be outlawed, and here I am, an articulate journalist, speaking of how evil white people “used to be.”  These comments don’t come from a bitter place of resentment, but if we are to discuss exactly what Black History is, we can’t overlook the past realities of slavery, segregation, racism, prejudice, inequality, lynching, ridicule, gentrification, and psychological deterioration.  So how do we define this month and why is it important?

Well, in my opinion, the 28 day holiday serves as an annual reminder that, as a Black American, I must be on my ultimate hustle.  To achieve greatness, I have to work 12 times harder than any of my white peers just to be viewed as “equal”.  I used to get made fun of for being an overachiever. Most people don’t understand my need to work overtime as my passion to go to school full time. Everyone makes comments about me doing too much.  I used to have a part time job at Niketown and had a hard time making friends because being in grad school with high goals and no children while black was a bit odd. But when you experience the true meaning of being Black in America, it’s hard to accept anything less than perfect. You either go hard or go home.

Each February I am reminded of all the ridiculous, unrealistic, “Lifetime: Television Made for Women” BS I had to endure the previous year.  At the moment, I am reflecting about my life as an undergraduate at my former school’s Theatre Department.  This was a very special place where professors told me that I must minds because being in grad school with high goals and no children, while black, was a bit odd.  But when you experience the true meaning of being Black in America, it’s hard to accept anything less than perfect.  aster a black dialect because that would be 80% of my work, that I had good auditions but didn’t really quite “fit” any of the roles, and that my type would lead to a career playing stereotypes.  I graduated having played a criminal, a servant, a juvenile delinquent, and a voodoo priest in some of their productions.  Now, I am at SAIC pursuing a career in journalism.

For someone like me, Black History Month is a time to just think about how corrupt everything is. But it is also an opportunity to inspire change.  Oh, yes.  There’s that word again, “change”.  And thanks to Obama and his incredible league of good doers, the word has been beaten into our skulls.  But before we allow it become another cliche term (such as “getting jiggy”) we must really make an attempt to understand what changes can be made.  Do you acknowledge security guards on campus?  Do you surround yourself with a diverse group of people?  Have you ever watched BET?  Have you ever been on the south side?  Would you ever date someone outside of your race?  Do you have any role models who are not white? Did you answer “no” to any of these questions?  Are you lying to me?  Okay.  Now we are getting somewhere.

For the most part, no one takes this month seriously and I doubt anyone in my new setting will be actively engaged in anything beyond Oprah and Obama—but Black History Month is a little bit more than just reading a poster about Martin Luther King Jr. It’s a little bit deeper than knowing that Jackie Robinson played baseball and that Harriette Tubman was a conductor on the Underground Railroad. The bottom line, is that there is no excuse for any American of any race not to take interest in Black History Month because as the McDonald’s commercials say, “Black History is American History”. We should all be very aware of the history of our country included regardless of how uncomfortable it makes us feel.  Black History Month is a like a friendly Google reminder that pops up and says “Hey Bucko, Black people are important too!”  But do you click on the ads and do a little investigating on the subject or do you merely hit the ignore button?

So I strongly urge you to take a risk in February 2009. Go ahead!  You’re in school.  Educate yourself.  Yes, you might have voted for a Black president but there are still major problems with race in this country and knowledge is the first step in repairing that.  Before you can allow yourself to have any spirited reaction to this article, I would hope that it sparked an interest in more information.

And for those of you who have been protesting for a White History Month, may I remind you that every fourth thursday of November we are all forced to celebrate the genocide and extinction of Native Americans… I mean seriously, since when did going away parties become annual?

Read More

Native American Health Care

By Uncategorized

Read More

Stains

By Uncategorized

Read More

Camp Hope: How Not to Organize a Protest

By Uncategorized

Freezing temperatures and blizzard conditions did not deter a determined group of activists, who spent much of January in Drexel Square Park, mere blocks from Barack Obama’s south Chicago residence. The 19-day vigil, dubbed “Camp Hope” by organizers, was intended to remind Obama of promises made throughout the campaign and pressure him to meet specific goals held by the progressive groups which supported his presidential bid.

However, the message may have been a little lost over the course of the demonstration. It would have helped, perhaps, if Camp Hope had been promoting one specific message rather than eight divergent and often nebulous areas of concern. Some issues were simple enough: the demands for universal health care, an immediate end to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, signing on to the Kyoto Protocol, eliminating nuclear weapons, and placing a 90-day moratorium on housing foreclosures. Other goals were more vague: immigration reform, more diplomatic relations with Pakistan, encouraging global nuclear disarmament and an end to the documented racial disparity in poverty and prison populations. However these demands weren’t connected to practical steps that might be taken to accomplish the goals.

Adding to the confusion were the number of groups involved. Various national and international organizations stood in 8-hour shifts, including Code Pink and Oxfam International, joined by a number of local groups such as Hyde Parkers for Peace and Justice and the North Suburban Peace Initiative. There appeared to be little communication between participating organizations, and no outreach to individuals unaffiliated with any particular group who might want to join the vigil. Turnout was small, and the demonstrations appeared disorganized and unwelcoming. Separate groups did not engage with one another and appeared mostly focused with their own pet causes and internal concerns.

In the month leading to Camp Hope, organizers attempted to spread the word via press releases, media appearances, and an internet presence touting a number of speakers and events, such as a kickoff party (which did not begin until long after the advertised time, forcing early arrivals to wait in freezing weather), screenings of the films “Dr. Strangelove” and “Taxi to the Darkside”, and forums on everything from economic justice to “The Myth of A Post-Racial America.” Despite these attempts to encourage participation, the Camp Hope website was not updated with current information after the first day or two of the vigil, and emails requesting information about the protest remained unanswered. Any engagement with the media seemed limited to promotion in the early days of January.

There also remains the question of why pro-Obama activists would protest their candidate before he had even taken office. Camp Hope has been careful to characterize itself as an encouraging “presence” in Obama’s neighborhood, but to uninformed onlookers the vigils and marches certainly may have looked negative. So far, there has been no response from the Obama administration; Kathy Kelly of Voices for Creative Nonviolence, one of the minds behind the event, told reporters, “we’re just about as close as you can get to his house right now. We’ve seen his motorcade go by, so he knows we’re here. He’s welcome to come down and talk to us.”

Though the dedication of those who braved the Chicago winter for 19 days in order to send a message to the new administration is certainly admirable, the lack of any sort of cohesive message or voice is not likely to sway the president one way or another.

Read More