• 

Villains come in two types these days. There are the kind with diabolical world-domination schemes and hats that have horns on them or costumes that use a ridiculous amount of plastic. I’m certain those costume designers got their inspiration from the shiny plastic body suit days in the ‘60s and ‘70s. There are also the kind that sneak around like Klingonese P’tachs with chainsaws, masks, evil cackles, and grins that make you assume that filthy scenes of gore and physical suffering are soon to follow. That’s Hollywood, you guys. Textbook villains, characters that are so outrageous that you can stomach it, so out of the realms of real human suffering that you can walk to your car in your mini-skirt and heels after a scary movie and not worry that someone will pop out of nowhere and throw you in a pit of used hypodermic needles — these villains are not the kind that will keep you up at night fretting at the stability of your domestic safety. Hollywood villains don’t horrify, they just thrill. But these aren’t villains at all- they’re “bad guys” and nothing more. They don’t go beyond fiction and they never will.

Real villains are the kind of people you try to forget when you look in the mirror, or the kind of animals that make you physically sick with resentment and disgust. Real villains are incapable of evoking pity or empathy from their viewers.

Of course, the best movies are those with real villains, like “The Cook, The Thief, His Wife and Her Lover (1989)” by Peter Greenaway, in which the (should be) legendary Michael Gambon plays the despicable Albert Spica, a British mob boss turned restaurant-owner who abuses and humiliates everyone around him, especially his wife, Georgina Spica (Helen Mirren). The entire 124-minute film (or the 98 minute film, depending on which version you watch) takes place in the various rooms of a fine French restaurant run by Richard Borst (Richard Bohringer). The plot of the film is fairly simple — Georgina (Mirren) meets a man named Michael at the restaurant (played by Alan Howard) and has an affair with him, thus propelling the story into action.

But, this plot is only the most basic element, despite the frequent and heinous turn of events. The reason why I would bother to write about this film is because of my inability to finish the film. This is not a bad thing however — it means that the characters are so believable, the suffering is so monumental, the struggle so heart wrenching, that by the time I simply had to close my laptop screen I was on the brink of vomiting. I am not exaggerating. You should be warned that this film was rated X because of its pornographic elements, but that’s not what bothered me. Albert Spica is the most evil character I have ever experienced in a film or work of literature, so much so that as I write this review, I am actually reversing all of the self-debate I have on whether I should finish the film. This delights me, though, so don’t get me wrong here. I have a great deal of respect for actors who can make me sick to the stomach because of how vile their characters are and how well they make that vileness transcend the screen. If you’re tired of the typical Hollywood villain, you absolutely must watch Michael Gambon’s performance as Albert Spica. Spica is the perfect villain, the most wretched of bad guys, the example of absolute human cruelty and stupidity, and the fundamental antagonist to which all other antagonists should be compared. For example, at one point, Albert Spica drags his wife into the restaurant’s kitchen and finds a young dishwasher boy hard at work at the sinks. Spica insults his wife and the boy by describing his wife as a sort of nymphomaniac, then offers his wife to the boy to make him sexually mature. When the boy refuses, and is very clearly terrified, Spica drags both of them outside, crams them into the backseat of his car, and proceeds to rape his wife. This is a realistic evil that renders all of those world domination plots mediocre.

Visually speaking, “The Cook, The Thief, His Wife and Her Lover” is delightfully detailed. Greenaway was very thoughtful about the set design, with elegant references to Dutch still life and portrait paintings served on silver platters and plastered on walls. What made me giddy was how the color schemes and colors of the costumes change every time the camera pans to a new room, so it is as if the film is more of a four-dimensional historical painting. The references to “high culture” in the silverware, the table decorations, the carpet, the clothes, the paintings, and preparation and presentation of gourmet food is a brilliant juxtaposition in relation to the brutishness of Spica and his cronies. This film is, to me at least, a visual/historical/poetical orgasm.

It seems to me that any film that can make a person too afraid to watch it from beginning to end is a film worth appreciating. When a director creates a character so odious and when an actor plays said character so well, it’s hard not to find satisfaction and relief when considering the character’s (eventual) demise. Knowing that personalities like Albert Spica will reap what he has sown, however disgusting or disturbing his punishment may be, makes the world a little bit brighter every time the film is fed through the proverbial projector machine. This movie is, I think, for only the bravest of movie-lovers who wish to see one of the best examples of the darkest elements of humanity, but I also think the world would do well by taking note of films like these, where fear and hatred are seen instead of Hollywood-type villains. The Cook, The Thief, His Wife and Her Lover raises cinematic and performative standards, so please for the love of whatever deity to which you may or may not subscribe, watch as much of this film as you can stomach and then tell Hollywood to raise their standards.

Dean of Graduate Studies Rebecca Duclos has invited all SAIC graduate students to her Humboldt Park home this Friday. A recent Montreal transplant still settling into her apartment with scant furniture and lots of space, she will be host to students and FVNMA faculty member Frédéric Moffet to discuss the queering of “manly mythologies” in celebrity culture for the first in a series of home discussion salons titled “Dean, Not I.”

Duclos began her post as dean in July of this year and she began looking for ways to engage the entire graduate student population at SAIC. “I decided to organize something that is in concert with the way that I’m thinking about gatherings,” Duclos explained. With the Italian conversazione and the French salons as her framework, she organized the series for students to get together to talk about ideas in a very informal way. “I’m interested in random research, or what I call para-academic research,” she continued. “The kind of research that we do which often doesn’t make it to the record books — things like accidents or chance or synchronicity, gut feeling, intuition — these kinds of hunches that we often have about something, in combination with a more directed pursuit of that thing.”

“Sponsored by the Dean of Graduate Studies,” the flyer reads, “the series purposefully sublimates the identity of its sponsor in order to foreground an organizational logic that is more outwardly and aberrantly focused only on the word ‘dean.’” Under the “Dean, Not I” theme — an idea she came up with on her bike ride to school, she said — the series includes a discussion about James Dean on Friday, followed by “Urban Cannibals: Hannibal Lecter Eats Dean and Deluca” in February, “Howard Dean’s Scream: Politics and Vocality” in March, and “Body, Music, Ice: Torvill and Dean’s Skateology” in the final salon in April.

“I see myself as a facilitator, someone who brings people together,” Duclos said. “And that’s essentially what deans do — we navigate and negotiate between faculty and the students. So for me to be able to offer my house and create a receptacle in which students and a faculty members can converse about something that doesn’t necessarily get covered in the classroom, it’s something that I wanted to try and foreground — their activity rather than my own voice.”

James Dean: Queering Manly Mythologies
30 November, 2012, 6:00 to 8:00 p.m.
1510 North Fairfield Ave. #1  (Humboldt Park)

 

The 2012 election — the political ads, the Facebook rants, the female-filled binders — is over! It’s really over! A few days after Obama’s victory speech, SAIC students weigh in on the results.

Hell yeah, [I voted]! [It will be] better than if Romney would have won, because he didn’t support much of what I do. He would have cut off Big Bird [laughs], which is not really nice — I grew up on that. This is the first time I’ve ever voted in 22 years, so that was pretty fun. I came from the Dominican Republic and couldn’t vote because I was too young, I came here and couldn’t vote because I was here, and then I became a citizen and couldn’t vote, because the four years weren’t done, so I’m pretty happy that I voted for Obama.
-Jose Jimenez. BFA
______________________________________________________________________________________

I’m ecstatic [about the election results]. I’m super happy that Obama won, and I think that it’s going to affect the rest of my life. His choices, especially within the Supreme Court justices that he will choose within the next couple of years, are going to make huge impact on a lot of women’s rights issues and future environmental issues that I’m really passionate about. Those three supreme court justices that he’ll choose are in there for the rest of his life, so they’re going to be making laws that affect my entire life.
-Megan Isaacs, BFA

______________________________________________________________________________________

I was not surprised that Obama won, but the other election results were surprising to me. I did not think that the issue of gay marriage was going to come out so positively in four states, and I didn’t think the legalization of marijuana was going to happen. My brother lives in Colorado so that was kind of funny [laughs]. I was nervous, because everyone had been saying how close this election was going to be, and I feel like there were a lot more progressive, liberal outcomes than I was expecting. Now that Obama doesn’t have to worry about being reelected, I think a lot of what he really wants to do is going to come out in the next few years.
-Carrie Heckel, BFA

______________________________________________________________________________________

I’m from Ghana. I had a casual interest in [the election here]. I don’t think the results will affect me directly, or even immediately. I feel like a lot of the policies are aimed at domestic issues — things with the economy, jobs, and stuff like that. I watched the debates on foreign policy, and I feel like both candidates seemed to be advocating similar platforms. Things will probably stay the same in terms of how the U.S. engages with foreign countries.
-Kekeli Sumah, BFA

______________________________________________________________________________________

[The election results] are going to keep things the same as they’ve been for the past four years I think, but moving forward more. Not the drastic change we would have had if Romney had won. I had an absentee ballot from New Hampshire. I’m from New Hampshire, so I made sure I was still voting even though I was here.
-Sarah Robinson, BFA

______________________________________________________________________________________

I did not vote, because I didn’t feel like I was informed on the issues. It was also because I feel like the elections are becoming more of a personality contest, where other candidates don’t even really get the chance to express their views because they’re not put on news stations like CNN or Fox, which I think is really unfortunate. I don’t feel like just because people spend so much time to get the right to vote that it’s my responsibility to do it. I feel like it’s my own right to vote.
-Parker Bright, BFA